The Journal of Fixed Income
https://iij.journals.publicknowledgeproject.org/iij/index.php/jfi
<p><em>The Journal of Fixed Income</em> (JFI) provides sophisticated analytical research and case studies on bond instruments of all types – investment grade, high-yield, municipals, ABS and MBS, and structured products such as CDOs and credit derivatives. Industry experts offer detailed models and analyses of fixed income structuring, performance tracking, and risk management. The JFI helps readers to manage bond portfolios more efficiently, evaluate interest rate strategies and manage interest rate risk, gain insights on structured products, and to stay on the cutting edge of fixed income markets.</p> <p>We focus on topics that are relevant and important to practitioners, grounded in sound theoretical foundations, while also welcoming novel work applicable to a broad set of markets.</p> <p>To support work that lies at the intersection of academic ideas and the practice of fixed income portfolio management. The articles, authored by sell side and buy side investment professionals, the Federal Reserve System, the Bank for International Settlements, the International Monetary Fund, the government-sponsored agencies and rating agencies, provide insights to practitioners and help academics focus on timely and relevant applied research. </p> <p><em>The Journal of Fixed Income</em> aims to be the forum for academics and fixed income portfolio managers to exchange information that advances the practice of investment management.</p> <p><em>The Journal of Fixed Income </em>was founded by Douglas T. Breeden in 1991. At the time, he was a professor of finance at Duke University and managing Smith Breeden Associates, a bank consulting and fixed income asset management firm that he founded in 1982. Stanley Kon assumed the editorship of in 2001.</p> <p>The Journal was launched due to a growing number of researchers and practitioners specializing in fixed income and the need for a platform that helps them to improve their models and performance by staying up-to-date on the topic. Read the first editor's letter <a href="https://jfi.pm-research.com/sites/default/files/IIJ%20assets/pdfs/JFI_Vol_1_Issue_1_Letter.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><u>here</u></a>.</p>
With Intelligence
en-US
The Journal of Fixed Income
1059-8596
<p><strong> </strong><strong> </strong></p> <p><strong>COPYRIGHT AGREEMENT</strong></p> <p>Author: _____________________________________________________________________________________(the “Author)</p> <p>Address & Phone: _________________________________________________________________________________________</p> <p>Article Title: _________________________________________________________________________________ (the “Article”)</p> <p>Journal: <em>The Journal of ________________________________________________________________________ </em>(the “Journal”)</p> <p> </p> <p>Please indicate type of work:</p> <p>□ Author’s own work □ Work of the US government □ Work made for hire</p> <p>The Author hereby submits the Article to Pageant Media Ltd./“Portfolio Management Research” (PMR) for publication in the Journal. The signing of this document represents and warrants that (i) he or she is authorized to assign the copyright in and to the Article and (ii) neither the Article nor this Copyright Agreement violates any rights of any other party. The Author hereby assigns and transfers to PMR the copyright in and to the Article, throughout the world. All other intellectual property rights relating to the Article shall remain with the Author<em>. </em>The Author understands that PMR shall have the right to use the Article without restriction in any manner and in any media now known or hereafter invented or developed. If PMR intends to make any changes to the content of the published article, it is required to seek prior written permission from the Author.</p> <p>PMR grants to the Author the following non-exclusive rights:</p> <ol><li>The right to post on internal or external-facing websites the Article’s title and abstract together with a link to the published Article on PMR’s website. In connection with such posting, the Author shall include a copyright notice in substantially the following form: “© [year of publication] PMR. All rights reserved.”</li><li>The right to use charts, tables, and figures from the article on presentation slides, but not in articles, book chapters, or similar formats consisting primarily of text content.</li></ol> <p>The Author shall remove any and all pre-publication versions of the Article from all websites (including SSRN and ResearchGate).</p> <p>The Author understands and agrees that, except as provided above, any use, reproduction, or dissemination of the article is strictly prohibited, unless agreed to in writing by PMR. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the Author shall not (i) post the Article to any file-sharing service (including SSRN and ResearchGate), (ii) distribute the Article at any academic or industry conferences or similar events, (iii) include the article in an academic course pack or similar compilation, or (iv) allow the article to be reprinted as a chapter in a book. <strong>In the event that the Author violates the foregoing restrictions on use, reproduction, or dissemination of the Article, the Author agrees to pay PMR damages equal to PMR’s then applicable rate for unrestricted distribution rights for the Article for the duration of the violation.</strong></p> <p>The Author shall not publish or disseminate any update, sequel, or other work based on or derived from the Article unless such update, sequel, or other work contains at least one-third new content.</p> <p>The Author warrants that the necessary written permission to reproduce, in the Article and in the Journal, for both print and electronic versions, any text, exhibits, or other material from the original copyright owner or appropriate authorities. The Author confirms that the article is an original work, does not infringe upon the intellectual property of a third party, and cannot be construed as plagiarizing another published work. The Author maintains that the Article contains no statement that is abusive, defamatory, libelous, obscene, fraudulent, does not infringe upon the rights of others, is unlawful, or is in violation of applicable laws.</p> <p>Any alterations to this agreement will be considered null and void unless agreed to in writing by PMR.</p> <p>______________________________________________________ ____________________<br /> Author’s signature Date</p> <p>______________________________________________________ ____________________<br /> Company representative’s signature* Date</p> <p>If work made for hire</p> <p>*If left blank Authors signature will be accepted automatically as company representative</p> <p> </p> <table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="708"><tbody><tr><td width="270" valign="top"><p>If the Article has been published or submitted for publication before in any form, please note where <br /> and when:</p></td> <td width="438" valign="top"><p>p</p></td></tr></tbody></table> <p>For expanded explanation of how you can use pre/post publication versions of your article please visit <a href="https://www.pm-research.com/permissions-and-reprints">https://www.pm-research.com/permissions-and-reprints</a></p><p> </p>
-
A Copula-Augmented Nelson-Siegel Model for ESG Bond Portfolio Optimization
https://iij.journals.publicknowledgeproject.org/iij/index.php/jfi/article/view/14497
<p>This paper presents a novel copula-based no-arbitrage pricing framework for forecasting bond returns and optimizing bond portfolios. Extending the dynamic Nelson-Siegel model with regular vine copulas for term structure dependencies, we generate step-ahead forecasts for zero-coupon bond yields, which are subsequently applied to obtain and simulate the no-arbitrage prices for both callable and non-callable fixed-coupon bonds. These simulated bond prices serve as inputs for a novel convex multiobjective portfolio optimization, incorporating key criteria such as ESG score, average return, Conditional Value-at-Risk (CVaR), distance-to-default, transaction cost, and option-adjusted duration and convexity. Applying our methodology to a dataset of 879 corporate bonds denominated in Euros from January 2016 to July 2024, we demonstrate that the suggested copula-based no-arbitrage pricing framework takes advantage of the yield curve non-linear dependence structure and offers bond portfolios that consistently outperform those portfolios based on the classical dynamic Nelson-Siegel approach and an equally weighted (EQW) benchmark in terms of higher returns and Sharpe ratios while effectively reducing tail risk.</p>
Maziar Sahamkhadam
Andreas Stephan
Yarema Okhrin
Copyright (c) 2026 The Journal of Fixed Income
2026-07-30
2026-07-30
35 3
-
A General Framework for Calculating Returns on Syndicated Loans
https://iij.journals.publicknowledgeproject.org/iij/index.php/jfi/article/view/14505
<p>We provide the general method for calculating returns on syndicated loans. Our approach accounts for amortization, price changes, coupon income, and fees, while allowing for floating benchmarks with caps and floors. Omitting any of these components may lead to biased return estimates that can be especially large in cross-sectional studies. A worked example illustrates implementation using real loan data. The return formula can be adapted for term loans, revolvers, or other credit instruments.</p>
Mehdi Beyhaghi
Sina Ehsani
Copyright (c) 2026 The Journal of Fixed Income
2026-07-30
2026-07-30
35 3
-
Central Banks’ Monetary Tones Across Economies
https://iij.journals.publicknowledgeproject.org/iij/index.php/jfi/article/view/14647
<p>This article documents that cross-economy variation in central banks’ monetary tones predicts subsequent changes in yields. We sort the cross-section of weekly monetary tones of developed economies’ central banks into low, mid, and high tones portfolios and record the average weekly change in yields, rebalancing weekly. We find a significant high-low yield change spread of 69 basis points annually, on average, over the period January 2015 – July 2024. When adding emerging economies’ central banks, the corresponding spread increases to 180 basis points. Performance is largely unaffected while controlling for fixed-income factors. We observe substantial heterogeneity in the time-series response of yields to tones for distinct developed economies’ central banks. We also find that more hawkish monetary tones tend to be associated with reductions in the slope of the yield curve.</p>
Ronnie Sadka
Copyright (c) 2026 The Journal of Fixed Income
2026-07-30
2026-07-30
35 3
-
Corporate bond returns: Does news sentiment matter?
https://iij.journals.publicknowledgeproject.org/iij/index.php/jfi/article/view/14659
<p>We examine whether news sentiment predicts corporate bond returns in both the cross-section and<br>time series. Using univariate and double-sorted portfolios by investment grade, issuer size, maturity,<br>and liquidity, we find that while some results are statistically significant, the economic magnitudes are<br>negligible. Unlike evidence in equities and the limited bond literature, our findings suggest that news<br>sentiment does not meaningfully explain the cross-sectional variation in corporate bond returns and<br>provides no incremental pricing power as a bond risk factor.</p>
Lachlan Michalski
Rand Kwong Yew Low
Lara Cathcart
Lina El-Jahel
Copyright (c) 2026 The Journal of Fixed Income
2026-07-30
2026-07-30
35 3
-
Riskless Principal Trades in Corporate Bond Markets
https://iij.journals.publicknowledgeproject.org/iij/index.php/jfi/article/view/14661
<p>We identify growth in riskless principal trades using corporate bond market trade data. These trades are arranged by a dealer that obtains compensation by marking up the price instead of charging a commission. In the U.S. markets, over the last 18 years, riskless principal trades increased from 16% to 42% of all customer trades, while the size of non-zero markups declined 48% on average, with most changes occurring recently. The growth in electronic trading systems undoubtedly explains these trends, but most traders cannot directly access these systems. Some changes to bond market structure could further decrease investor transaction costs.</p>
Louis Craig
Larry Harris
Thomas Shohfi
Copyright (c) 2026 The Journal of Fixed Income
2026-07-30
2026-07-30
35 3
-
Option Option-Implied Probabilities and Bond Valuation
https://iij.journals.publicknowledgeproject.org/iij/index.php/jfi/article/view/14755
<p>Traditional short-rate lattice models assume that interest rates move up or down with equal risk-neutral probability. This symmetry is a convenient modeling device, but it does not reflect how markets actually price risk. We recover contract-level risk-neutral probabilities using option data and find persistent and systematic departures from the 50/50 benchmark. These option-implied asymmetries vary across maturities and market conditions, particularly during volatile episodes such as the onset of the COVID-19 crisis. Embedding the recovered probabilities into bond valuation reveals significant consequences for practitioners. Symmetric models consistently misprice bonds by several basis points, bias expected holding-period returns, and generate hedge ratios that lead to larger tracking errors, higher turnover, and greater transaction costs. Models disciplined by option-implied probabilities produce bond valuations more consistent with market prices, return forecasts that better capture term premia, and hedges that perform more effectively. The results demonstrate that the symmetry assumption underlying standard short-rate trees is empirically false and economically costly to ignore.</p>
Frank J. Fabozzi
Ayush Jha
Ali Jaffri
Svetlozar Rachev
Copyright (c) 2026 The Journal of Fixed Income
2026-07-30
2026-07-30
35 3